Comments on: S&W 637 http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/2009/01/01/sw-637/ Firearms Policy and Politics in Pennsylvania Sat, 20 Mar 2010 07:13:59 -0400 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Jake http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/2009/01/01/sw-637/#comment-35991 Jake Sat, 03 Jan 2009 04:59:57 +0000 http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=7446#comment-35991 The S&W 442 is a very, very nice revolver, but that trigger pull borders on ridiculous! I had to trade mine because of that. (I seem to have inherited Dad's essential tremors, and a strong trigger pull is one of the things that set them off.) I ended up getting a Taurus PT-145, which actually carries better (no cylinder bulge) and has the twin bonuses of 10+1 in .45ACP. The S&W 442 is a very, very nice revolver, but that trigger pull borders on ridiculous! I had to trade mine because of that. (I seem to have inherited Dad’s essential tremors, and a strong trigger pull is one of the things that set them off.)

I ended up getting a Taurus PT-145, which actually carries better (no cylinder bulge) and has the twin bonuses of 10+1 in .45ACP.

]]> By: Crucis http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/2009/01/01/sw-637/#comment-35977 Crucis Fri, 02 Jan 2009 17:27:28 +0000 http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=7446#comment-35977 I carry a hammerless S&W 442 snubbie in a pocket holster. Hammers just snag on clothes when you need a fast draw. I have one but I'll only carry it in a OWB paddle holster. I have a S&W M13 that I carry in a IWB holster. The piece has a factory-bobbed hammer. My M19 has a hammer, but it's too bulky for carry except in a shoulder holster and I dont have one. Just my $0.02. I carry a hammerless S&W 442 snubbie in a pocket holster. Hammers just snag on clothes when you need a fast draw. I have one but I’ll only carry it in a OWB paddle holster.

I have a S&W M13 that I carry in a IWB holster. The piece has a factory-bobbed hammer. My M19 has a hammer, but it’s too bulky for carry except in a shoulder holster and I dont have one.

Just my $0.02.

]]> By: Carl in Chicago http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/2009/01/01/sw-637/#comment-35972 Carl in Chicago Fri, 02 Jan 2009 12:35:51 +0000 http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=7446#comment-35972 Remember that last time, WI missed over-riding Doyle's veto by only one or two votes, and that in 2006, the Kansas legislature over-rode their governor's veto of shall-issue. WI can still pass it, despite Doyle. Remember that last time, WI missed over-riding Doyle’s veto by only one or two votes, and that in 2006, the Kansas legislature over-rode their governor’s veto of shall-issue.

WI can still pass it, despite Doyle.

]]> By: PeterFF http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/2009/01/01/sw-637/#comment-35967 PeterFF Fri, 02 Jan 2009 02:47:22 +0000 http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=7446#comment-35967 Thanks for rubbing it in. Dumping Doyle is high on my list of priorities for 2010. Thanks for rubbing it in.
Dumping Doyle is high on my list of priorities for 2010.

]]>