Snowflakes in Hell


Firearms Policy and Politics in Pennsylvania

S&W 637

author Posted by:Sebastian on date Jan 1st, 2009 | filed Filed under: Gun P0rn

I’d say “Nice Carry Gun,” but he lives in Wisconsin.  Someday, Peter.  Someday.  You have to get rid of Doyle first though.

Related posts:

  1. Good News From Wisconsin
  2. Paging Governor Jim Doyle
  3. Wisconsin Motion in Heller

tag4 Responses to “S&W 637”

  1. PeterFF Said,
    January 1st, 2009 at 9:47 pm

    Thanks for rubbing it in.
    Dumping Doyle is high on my list of priorities for 2010.

  2. Carl in Chicago Said,
    January 2nd, 2009 at 7:35 am

    Remember that last time, WI missed over-riding Doyle’s veto by only one or two votes, and that in 2006, the Kansas legislature over-rode their governor’s veto of shall-issue.

    WI can still pass it, despite Doyle.

  3. Crucis Said,
    January 2nd, 2009 at 12:27 pm

    I carry a hammerless S&W 442 snubbie in a pocket holster. Hammers just snag on clothes when you need a fast draw. I have one but I’ll only carry it in a OWB paddle holster.

    I have a S&W M13 that I carry in a IWB holster. The piece has a factory-bobbed hammer. My M19 has a hammer, but it’s too bulky for carry except in a shoulder holster and I dont have one.

    Just my $0.02.

  4. Jake Said,
    January 2nd, 2009 at 11:59 pm

    The S&W 442 is a very, very nice revolver, but that trigger pull borders on ridiculous! I had to trade mine because of that. (I seem to have inherited Dad’s essential tremors, and a strong trigger pull is one of the things that set them off.)

    I ended up getting a Taurus PT-145, which actually carries better (no cylinder bulge) and has the twin bonuses of 10+1 in .45ACP.