Snowflakes in Hell


Firearms Policy and Politics in Pennsylvania

S&W 637

author Posted by:Sebastian on date Jan 1st, 2009 | filed Filed under: Gun P0rn

I’d say “Nice Carry Gun,” but he lives in Wisconsin.  Someday, Peter.  Someday.  You have to get rid of Doyle first though.

Post to Twitter Post to Digg Post to Facebook Post to StumbleUpon

Related posts (automatically generated):

  1. Good News From Wisconsin
  2. Paging Governor Jim Doyle
  3. Smith & Wesson Model 66-1

tag4 Responses to “S&W 637”

  1. PeterFF Said,
    January 1st, 2009 at 9:47 pm

    Thanks for rubbing it in.
    Dumping Doyle is high on my list of priorities for 2010.

  2. Carl in Chicago Said,
    January 2nd, 2009 at 7:35 am

    Remember that last time, WI missed over-riding Doyle’s veto by only one or two votes, and that in 2006, the Kansas legislature over-rode their governor’s veto of shall-issue.

    WI can still pass it, despite Doyle.

  3. Crucis Said,
    January 2nd, 2009 at 12:27 pm

    I carry a hammerless S&W 442 snubbie in a pocket holster. Hammers just snag on clothes when you need a fast draw. I have one but I’ll only carry it in a OWB paddle holster.

    I have a S&W M13 that I carry in a IWB holster. The piece has a factory-bobbed hammer. My M19 has a hammer, but it’s too bulky for carry except in a shoulder holster and I dont have one.

    Just my $0.02.

  4. Jake Said,
    January 2nd, 2009 at 11:59 pm

    The S&W 442 is a very, very nice revolver, but that trigger pull borders on ridiculous! I had to trade mine because of that. (I seem to have inherited Dad’s essential tremors, and a strong trigger pull is one of the things that set them off.)

    I ended up getting a Taurus PT-145, which actually carries better (no cylinder bulge) and has the twin bonuses of 10+1 in .45ACP.