<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Brady Campaign Files Suit over National Park Issue</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/2008/12/30/brady-campaign-files-suit-over-national-park-issue/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/2008/12/30/brady-campaign-files-suit-over-national-park-issue/</link>
	<description>Firearms Policy and Politics in Pennsylvania</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 08:10:25 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Mayor Joel Stoner</title>
		<link>http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/2008/12/30/brady-campaign-files-suit-over-national-park-issue/#comment-35943</link>
		<dc:creator>Mayor Joel Stoner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 06:16:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=7424#comment-35943</guid>
		<description>Does the Brady Bunch, even have a legal standing to sue on this issue? It does not harm them in any way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does the Brady Bunch, even have a legal standing to sue on this issue? It does not harm them in any way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pro-Gun Progressive &#187; Standing</title>
		<link>http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/2008/12/30/brady-campaign-files-suit-over-national-park-issue/#comment-35917</link>
		<dc:creator>Pro-Gun Progressive &#187; Standing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 16:00:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=7424#comment-35917</guid>
		<description>[...] As others have noted, it comes as no surprise that the Brady Bunch has their facts garbled. How can you expect to successfully bring suit to the highest courts in the land and advance your cause when you fail to command even the most perfunctory facts of the case? One gathers that at this point the BC et al are dilettantes, superficially making stabs in the dark at relevancy without any real broad-based support or coherent agenda. In other words, the thinking over there seems to be &#8220;well we lost big on the be-all, end-all endgame at the SCOTUS, we&#8217;ve been abandoned by the one political party that used to actually answer our calls, our viewpoints are less popular year by year, and we&#8217;re running low on cash&#8230;I guess it&#8217;s better to do something, anything at all, no matter how disorganized and ill-conceived, since it&#8217;ll otherwise obvious that all we&#8217;re doing nothing.&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] As others have noted, it comes as no surprise that the Brady Bunch has their facts garbled. How can you expect to successfully bring suit to the highest courts in the land and advance your cause when you fail to command even the most perfunctory facts of the case? One gathers that at this point the BC et al are dilettantes, superficially making stabs in the dark at relevancy without any real broad-based support or coherent agenda. In other words, the thinking over there seems to be &#8220;well we lost big on the be-all, end-all endgame at the SCOTUS, we&#8217;ve been abandoned by the one political party that used to actually answer our calls, our viewpoints are less popular year by year, and we&#8217;re running low on cash&#8230;I guess it&#8217;s better to do something, anything at all, no matter how disorganized and ill-conceived, since it&#8217;ll otherwise obvious that all we&#8217;re doing nothing.&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cemetery's Gun Blob</title>
		<link>http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/2008/12/30/brady-campaign-files-suit-over-national-park-issue/#comment-35916</link>
		<dc:creator>Cemetery's Gun Blob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 15:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=7424#comment-35916</guid>
		<description>Idiots.

Moronacy like this dictates that the NRA, or some other large gun rights group point out what a bunch of retards the Brady Bunch is by doing press release or something pointing out, like what you mention, that CCW is already prohibited at the landmarks that have their knickers in a twist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Idiots.</p>
<p>Moronacy like this dictates that the NRA, or some other large gun rights group point out what a bunch of retards the Brady Bunch is by doing press release or something pointing out, like what you mention, that CCW is already prohibited at the landmarks that have their knickers in a twist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SayUncle &#187; Straws, grasping</title>
		<link>http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/2008/12/30/brady-campaign-files-suit-over-national-park-issue/#comment-35915</link>
		<dc:creator>SayUncle &#187; Straws, grasping</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 15:03:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=7424#comment-35915</guid>
		<description>[...] Update: As usual with the Brady folks, these claims are patently false. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Update: As usual with the Brady folks, these claims are patently false. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brady Campaign sues to stop Nat. Park carry &#8211; Call me Ahab</title>
		<link>http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/2008/12/30/brady-campaign-files-suit-over-national-park-issue/#comment-35914</link>
		<dc:creator>Brady Campaign sues to stop Nat. Park carry &#8211; Call me Ahab</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 13:23:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=7424#comment-35914</guid>
		<description>[...] Hardy has an analysis of the issues with their suit here.  Sebastian points out there are some logical inconsistencies in the complaints of the Brady Campaign.  From his blagowebs: Carrying firearms is still [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Hardy has an analysis of the issues with their suit here.  Sebastian points out there are some logical inconsistencies in the complaints of the Brady Campaign.  From his blagowebs: Carrying firearms is still [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Rittgers</title>
		<link>http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/2008/12/30/brady-campaign-files-suit-over-national-park-issue/#comment-35906</link>
		<dc:creator>David Rittgers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 23:34:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=7424#comment-35906</guid>
		<description>My fisking here:
http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/2008/12/30/brady-campaign-suing-to-block-concealed-carry-in-national-parks/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My fisking here:<br />
<a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/2008/12/30/brady-campaign-suing-to-block-concealed-carry-in-national-parks/" rel="nofollow">http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/2008/12/30/brady-campaign-suing-to-block-concealed-carry-in-national-parks/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
