… over at the ACLU. You’d imagine that one of the most prominent decisions regarding the Bill of Rights in years would at least be deserving of a mention.
UPDATE: Looks like they did release something, but it’s not prominent.
|
… over at the ACLU. You’d imagine that one of the most prominent decisions regarding the Bill of Rights in years would at least be deserving of a mention. UPDATE: Looks like they did release something, but it’s not prominent. 6 Responses to “Crickets …”
Leave a Reply
|
June 26th, 2008 at 5:53 pm
Oh, they stooped down and left a nice steaming load now.
Apparently there was some Supreme Court dicta about a “collective right”, which the current court “reinterpreted”. DC’s law became a “victim of that reinterpretation.” “It is too early to know how much of a constitutional straitjacket the new rule will create.”
If there was any doubt about the alliances and biases of the ACLU — the group that’s been willing to defend and employ pedophiles — let’s get rid of them here and now.
June 26th, 2008 at 5:56 pm
The ACLU’s website does mention today’s Heller decision, but it’s buried within a comprehensive article on other unrelated Supreme Court decisions and limited to just three paragraphs.
June 26th, 2008 at 5:58 pm
One wonders whether they’ll modify their FAQ:
http://aclu.org/police/gen/14523res20020304.html
June 26th, 2008 at 6:16 pm
The Crickets were a band with Buddy Holley - the ACLU plays drums in the Red Army Marching Band…
June 26th, 2008 at 6:36 pm
Oh, hey, Sebastian — did you see this?
June 26th, 2008 at 7:48 pm
http://www.aclu.org/scotus/2007term/35797prs20080626.html