<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Legality of DC Police State Checkpoint</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/2008/06/06/legality-of-dc-police-state-checkpoint/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/2008/06/06/legality-of-dc-police-state-checkpoint/</link>
	<description>Where There's Snow, There's Firepower</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 00:53:12 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Boyd</title>
		<link>http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/2008/06/06/legality-of-dc-police-state-checkpoint/#comment-24344</link>
		<dc:creator>Boyd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 14:18:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=3674#comment-24344</guid>
		<description>I read Orin's opinion as it's &lt;i&gt;probably&lt;/i&gt; not legal. Playing the devil's advocate here, the road blocks' constitutionality is debatable, so not using them before ithey're ruled unconstitutional is giving up a tool before you know you can't use it. Who's to say that a judge or appellate court would interpret the case law the same way Orin does?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read Orin&#8217;s opinion as it&#8217;s <i>probably</i> not legal. Playing the devil&#8217;s advocate here, the road blocks&#8217; constitutionality is debatable, so not using them before ithey&#8217;re ruled unconstitutional is giving up a tool before you know you can&#8217;t use it. Who&#8217;s to say that a judge or appellate court would interpret the case law the same way Orin does?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
