<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Civil Liberties Violation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/2008/06/05/civil-liberties-violation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/2008/06/05/civil-liberties-violation/</link>
	<description>Where There's Snow, There's Firepower</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 18:30:54 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jake</title>
		<link>http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/2008/06/05/civil-liberties-violation/#comment-24334</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 06:07:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=3658#comment-24334</guid>
		<description>Tyranny begins in small steps. Once people get used to it, they'll expand the program. Again and again.

Longer post on my blog. (http://curses-foiled-again.blogspot.com/)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tyranny begins in small steps. Once people get used to it, they&#8217;ll expand the program. Again and again.</p>
<p>Longer post on my blog. (http://curses-foiled-again.blogspot.com/)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HerrBGone</title>
		<link>http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/2008/06/05/civil-liberties-violation/#comment-24314</link>
		<dc:creator>HerrBGone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 21:06:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=3658#comment-24314</guid>
		<description>I’ve been starting to think along very much the same lines.  Just let them keep home rule long enough so that the plaintiff in DC v. Heller doesn’t evaporate prior to the ruling…</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’ve been starting to think along very much the same lines.  Just let them keep home rule long enough so that the plaintiff in DC v. Heller doesn’t evaporate prior to the ruling…</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Right Wing Nation &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Cracking Down On Crime!</title>
		<link>http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/2008/06/05/civil-liberties-violation/#comment-24300</link>
		<dc:creator>Right Wing Nation &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Cracking Down On Crime!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 16:47:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=3658#comment-24300</guid>
		<description>[...] Sebastian chimes in on the new, progressive, DC police state here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Sebastian chimes in on the new, progressive, DC police state here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/2008/06/05/civil-liberties-violation/#comment-24297</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 16:06:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=3658#comment-24297</guid>
		<description>There is an easier way than having the legislature dissolve the city government – just dissolve the city of Washington itself.  Re-establish the state boundary lines to where they were before the district was created and have the federal government occupy the current facilities as a sort of condominium, but each part of the city will become part of whichever state wherein it falls.  

There would be lots of advantages: the absurd possibility of DC statehood would be eliminated, Eleanor Holmes Norton could get a job selling knock-off handbags on the street (or some other occupation for which she is qualified), the new urban areas would actually receive revenue from the government in the form of property taxes, and I’m sure folks can think of other good reasons to make the district go away.  

Let’s start writing our representatives.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is an easier way than having the legislature dissolve the city government – just dissolve the city of Washington itself.  Re-establish the state boundary lines to where they were before the district was created and have the federal government occupy the current facilities as a sort of condominium, but each part of the city will become part of whichever state wherein it falls.  </p>
<p>There would be lots of advantages: the absurd possibility of DC statehood would be eliminated, Eleanor Holmes Norton could get a job selling knock-off handbags on the street (or some other occupation for which she is qualified), the new urban areas would actually receive revenue from the government in the form of property taxes, and I’m sure folks can think of other good reasons to make the district go away.  </p>
<p>Let’s start writing our representatives.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
