E-Mail Evidence
Posted by: Sebastian on
May 25th, 2008 |
Filed under: Guns
From David Olofson, we have the e-mail that ATF claims proves he purchased M16 parts. I see a lot of talk about M16 magazines, which are identical to AR-15 magazines, and talk about a bolt, which are also identical, AFAIK. But I only see one mention of M16 parts, and I would agree that in the realm of “proof” this isn’t it.

Second Amendment Blog
May 25th, 2008 at 11:11 am
bolts are different:
http://www.ar15.com/content/legal/AR15-M16Parts/
May 25th, 2008 at 11:15 am
The bolt carrier is different. The actual bolt is the part that fits inside the carrier, which as far as I know is the same for the M16 and AR-15. Though, a lot of people confuse the bolt with the bolt carrier.
May 26th, 2008 at 8:05 am
[...] Sebastian notes that the M16 parts allegedly bought by Olofson are magazines and bolts. That would mean they weren’t M16 parts at all. [...]
May 27th, 2008 at 7:44 am
Hmmm. Don’t really see anything there about M16 fire control parts. Bolts and bolt carriers are specificly legal.
Add A Comment