Snowflakes in Hell


Firearms Policy and Politics in Pennsylvania

One Blogger’s Response from Wal-Mart

author Posted by:Sebastian on date Apr 16th, 2008 | filed Filed under: Gun Rights

Over at Firearms and Freedom, Wal-Mart responds.  I still haven’t gotten anything yet.  If I get the same thing, I’ll let everyone know.  I find that response to be wholly inadequate, and while I understand Wal-Mart’s desire to be a “responsible retailer” they were already doing that by following the relevant state and federal regulations in regards to firearm sales.  This is not about being a responsible retailer.  If you want my guess, it’s about opening stores in New York City.  Wal-Mart is free as a business to decide these are reasonable steps, and I’m free as a consumer to shop elsewhere, which I will do.

Post to Twitter Post to Digg Post to Facebook Post to StumbleUpon

Related posts (automatically generated):

  1. More Details on the Wal-Mart Agreement
  2. Wal-Mart Sucks
  3. Time to Zumbo Wal-Mart

tag5 Responses to “One Blogger’s Response from Wal-Mart”

  1. kaveman308 Said,
    April 16th, 2008 at 10:47 am

    I got the exact same reply after I emailed them.

  2. Bob S. Said,
    April 16th, 2008 at 11:48 am

    Same here, a no answer reply. I plan on a follow up later tonight.

  3. TheGunGeek Said,
    April 16th, 2008 at 11:59 am

    Yup, the exact same letter was sent to me.

  4. nathan Said,
    April 16th, 2008 at 12:08 pm

    I got the same thing. Form letter response for something like this means I take ALL my business elsewhere…

  5. DirtCrashr Said,
    April 16th, 2008 at 12:11 pm

    Same here, I responded with: Bloomberg is dishonest and disingenuous with gun-owners, placing blame for his failed policies on other persons and even other States. However I understand he owns a lot of Wal-Mart stock.

    Meanwhile you have lost another customer – I will support other sellers who do not cave in to his peer-group pressure.