Comments on: It’s for the Children http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/2008/04/14/its-for-the-children-2/ Where There's Snow, There's Firepower Tue, 02 Dec 2008 21:04:59 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3 By: illspirit http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/2008/04/14/its-for-the-children-2/#comment-21435 illspirit Mon, 14 Apr 2008 22:08:19 +0000 http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=3216#comment-21435 Don't feel bad. I was quite disturbed by the story when it was posted at Fark the other day, and was about to rant about it before someone linked to the bill in the comments. Don’t feel bad. I was quite disturbed by the story when it was posted at Fark the other day, and was about to rant about it before someone linked to the bill in the comments.

]]> By: Tom http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/2008/04/14/its-for-the-children-2/#comment-21433 Tom Mon, 14 Apr 2008 21:49:38 +0000 http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=3216#comment-21433 Well, the "authorized journalists" strike again. Shame on us for biting...again. It seems that 90+% of "news" is lies of omission and only useful for keeping us out of an ice age. Well, the “authorized journalists” strike again. Shame on us for biting…again. It seems that 90+% of “news” is lies of omission and only useful for keeping us out of an ice age.

]]> By: Sebastian http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/2008/04/14/its-for-the-children-2/#comment-21429 Sebastian Mon, 14 Apr 2008 21:21:30 +0000 http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=3216#comment-21429 Oh dear, it would seem I've been mislead by bad reporting. Oh dear, it would seem I’ve been mislead by bad reporting.

]]> By: illspirit http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/2008/04/14/its-for-the-children-2/#comment-21428 illspirit Mon, 14 Apr 2008 21:17:23 +0000 http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=3216#comment-21428 It appears the journalist in the linked article left out a few details. Namely, that the law in question is about looking at naked children and/or exposing oneself to them. The amendment (underlined bits in .pdf) seem to indicate this somehow wasn't illegal in a public place before. http://www.mainelegislature.org/legis/bills/billpdfs/LD207901.pdf That said, I'm also guessing there was more to the guy-watching-kids-in-a-bathroom story than the original article is telling us.. It appears the journalist in the linked article left out a few details. Namely, that the law in question is about looking at naked children and/or exposing oneself to them. The amendment (underlined bits in .pdf) seem to indicate this somehow wasn’t illegal in a public place before.

http://www.mainelegislature.org/legis/bills/billpdfs/LD207901.pdf

That said, I’m also guessing there was more to the guy-watching-kids-in-a-bathroom story than the original article is telling us..

]]> By: Tom http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/2008/04/14/its-for-the-children-2/#comment-21425 Tom Mon, 14 Apr 2008 20:24:38 +0000 http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=3216#comment-21425 Does anyone know if York Police Chief Doug Bracy has any children or is he just using the collective (read communism we're headed towards) "our"? Just what the hell is "visual sexual aggression" why would that kind of nanny state big brother bullshit NOT apply to strip clubs? Would staring at "children" of the highly valued minority classes also constitute a hate crime, or maybe a new " ocular racism" crime can be created? Loophole? Those things USED to be called freedom. Maybe BHO's racist pastor was right..."God damn the united states" just for the wrong reasons. Does anyone know if York Police Chief Doug Bracy has any children or is he just using the collective (read communism we’re headed towards) “our”?

Just what the hell is “visual sexual aggression” why would that kind of nanny state big brother bullshit NOT apply to strip clubs? Would staring at “children” of the highly valued minority classes also constitute a hate crime, or maybe a new ” ocular racism” crime can be created?

Loophole? Those things USED to be called freedom.

Maybe BHO’s racist pastor was right…”God damn the united states” just for the wrong reasons.

]]>