Comments on: HB 1845 Considered - One Amendment Withdrawn http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/2008/03/31/amendment-withdrawn/ Where There's Snow, There's Firepower Wed, 03 Dec 2008 03:17:09 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3 By: Kurt "45superman" HOfmann http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/2008/03/31/amendment-withdrawn/#comment-21004 Kurt "45superman" HOfmann Tue, 01 Apr 2008 01:01:15 +0000 http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=3092#comment-21004 I see that there has been some kind of <a href="http://ydr.inyork.com/ci_8760516" rel="nofollow">Constitutional challenge</a> to the "lost or stolen" language (whether that's in reference to the U.S. Constitution, or Pennsylvania's, I don't know). Supposedly it was withdrawn, for some kind of technical, scheduling reason, but will be put back in place when needed. <i>GUN CONTROL: Rep. Bryan Cutler, R-Lancaster, withdrew from the House floor a pending constitutional challenge to legislation that would require owners to report within 72 hours when they realize a handgun has been lost or stolen. Cutler said he would withdraw the constitutional question because of House scheduling needs, but intended to renew it whenever the gun measure comes back before the chamber, perhaps as early as Tuesday.</i> I see that there has been some kind of Constitutional challenge to the “lost or stolen” language (whether that’s in reference to the U.S. Constitution, or Pennsylvania’s, I don’t know). Supposedly it was withdrawn, for some kind of technical, scheduling reason, but will be put back in place when needed.

GUN CONTROL: Rep. Bryan Cutler, R-Lancaster, withdrew from the House floor a pending constitutional challenge to legislation that would require owners to report within 72 hours when they realize a handgun has been lost or stolen. Cutler said he would withdraw the constitutional question because of House scheduling needs, but intended to renew it whenever the gun measure comes back before the chamber, perhaps as early as Tuesday.

]]>