<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Latest Poll on Second Amendment</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/2008/03/27/latest-poll-on-second-amendment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/2008/03/27/latest-poll-on-second-amendment/</link>
	<description>Where There's Snow, There's Firepower</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 02:15:29 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kathy</title>
		<link>http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/2008/03/27/latest-poll-on-second-amendment/#comment-20893</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 21:50:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/2008/03/27/latest-poll-on-second-amendment/#comment-20893</guid>
		<description>I don't know.  It does also say that the majority of people want stricter gun laws.  That doesn't fill me with warm and fuzzies :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know.  It does also say that the majority of people want stricter gun laws.  That doesn&#8217;t fill me with warm and fuzzies :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Turk Turon</title>
		<link>http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/2008/03/27/latest-poll-on-second-amendment/#comment-20880</link>
		<dc:creator>Turk Turon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 14:50:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/2008/03/27/latest-poll-on-second-amendment/#comment-20880</guid>
		<description>The text says, "A solid majority of the U.S. public ..."

But with numbers like this, they might also have phrased it, "By more than a 3-to-1 margin, the U.S. public supports ..."

Interesting how the media can "pimp" the numbers when they want to. It's true that 72-to-20 is a "solid majority", but come on! If the poll results had come out the other way around, they would have said, "By a nearly 4-to-1 margin, the U.S. public overwhelmingly opposes ..."

Grrrrr!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The text says, &#8220;A solid majority of the U.S. public &#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>But with numbers like this, they might also have phrased it, &#8220;By more than a 3-to-1 margin, the U.S. public supports &#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Interesting how the media can &#8220;pimp&#8221; the numbers when they want to. It&#8217;s true that 72-to-20 is a &#8220;solid majority&#8221;, but come on! If the poll results had come out the other way around, they would have said, &#8220;By a nearly 4-to-1 margin, the U.S. public overwhelmingly opposes &#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Grrrrr!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kaveman308</title>
		<link>http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/2008/03/27/latest-poll-on-second-amendment/#comment-20876</link>
		<dc:creator>kaveman308</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 14:33:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/2008/03/27/latest-poll-on-second-amendment/#comment-20876</guid>
		<description>I respectfully disagree.

My position is that it must suck to be Petey or Pauly ANY day. Recent events may serve to accentuate their degree of suckiness, but I maintain that they sucked hard long before and will suck hard long after "these days" come to pass.

Isn't it remarkable that within the pro-gunny movement, we can have civil discourse even when we disagree?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I respectfully disagree.</p>
<p>My position is that it must suck to be Petey or Pauly ANY day. Recent events may serve to accentuate their degree of suckiness, but I maintain that they sucked hard long before and will suck hard long after &#8220;these days&#8221; come to pass.</p>
<p>Isn&#8217;t it remarkable that within the pro-gunny movement, we can have civil discourse even when we disagree?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
