<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Reasoned EditorialsTM</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/2008/03/26/reasoned-editorialstm/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/2008/03/26/reasoned-editorialstm/</link>
	<description>Where There's Snow, There's Firepower</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 23:47:11 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: BobG</title>
		<link>http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/2008/03/26/reasoned-editorialstm/#comment-20888</link>
		<dc:creator>BobG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 17:57:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/2008/03/26/reasoned-editorialstm/#comment-20888</guid>
		<description>It reminds me of something written by a not-very-bright 12 year old.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It reminds me of something written by a not-very-bright 12 year old.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BillH</title>
		<link>http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/2008/03/26/reasoned-editorialstm/#comment-20844</link>
		<dc:creator>BillH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 21:35:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/2008/03/26/reasoned-editorialstm/#comment-20844</guid>
		<description>Bill Cope is a long running joke, revered by some of the peace,love,dove,hemp crowd here in Boise.  I read it this morning, thought about rebutting it on my blog, and decided not to, because he's Bill Cope... ha,ha,ha,ha.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill Cope is a long running joke, revered by some of the peace,love,dove,hemp crowd here in Boise.  I read it this morning, thought about rebutting it on my blog, and decided not to, because he&#8217;s Bill Cope&#8230; ha,ha,ha,ha.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Duck</title>
		<link>http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/2008/03/26/reasoned-editorialstm/#comment-20837</link>
		<dc:creator>The Duck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 20:16:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/2008/03/26/reasoned-editorialstm/#comment-20837</guid>
		<description>60,000 is pretty close, roughly 80% of those shot recover,&#38; with approx 12K  killed a year, 60k would not be outstanding.
With over 300,000,ooo people it's really not that big a number

Of course the real question is of the number shot, how many really needed to be shot? Chicago police did a study that 70% of homicide victims were felons. So of shootings that would cut the number of "decent people " getting shot down to 18k, &#38; those dying to what 3500-3600??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>60,000 is pretty close, roughly 80% of those shot recover,&amp; with approx 12K  killed a year, 60k would not be outstanding.<br />
With over 300,000,ooo people it&#8217;s really not that big a number</p>
<p>Of course the real question is of the number shot, how many really needed to be shot? Chicago police did a study that 70% of homicide victims were felons. So of shootings that would cut the number of &#8220;decent people &#8221; getting shot down to 18k, &amp; those dying to what 3500-3600??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BC</title>
		<link>http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/2008/03/26/reasoned-editorialstm/#comment-20836</link>
		<dc:creator>BC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 19:53:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/2008/03/26/reasoned-editorialstm/#comment-20836</guid>
		<description>Enh. I didn't bother reading further than the first paragraph, where the author started posturing about how despite the manifest futility of it all, he was coming down from the mountain to try to talk sense into we benighted "gun nuts". That was a sure sign that the rest of the editorial was going to be nothing more than ideological masturbation.

A man who jerks off in public just wants attention. Why give him any?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Enh. I didn&#8217;t bother reading further than the first paragraph, where the author started posturing about how despite the manifest futility of it all, he was coming down from the mountain to try to talk sense into we benighted &#8220;gun nuts&#8221;. That was a sure sign that the rest of the editorial was going to be nothing more than ideological masturbation.</p>
<p>A man who jerks off in public just wants attention. Why give him any?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/2008/03/26/reasoned-editorialstm/#comment-20832</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 19:31:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/2008/03/26/reasoned-editorialstm/#comment-20832</guid>
		<description>Ever notice how the number of people shot in the USA has been creeping upwards in these articles?    60,000?  Do reporters or Supreme Court justices actually do research?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ever notice how the number of people shot in the USA has been creeping upwards in these articles?    60,000?  Do reporters or Supreme Court justices actually do research?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
