Comments on: Progress on NFA Firearms http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/2008/03/14/progress-on-nfa-firearms/ Where There's Snow, There's Firepower Thu, 20 Nov 2008 14:02:53 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3 By: Hello http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/2008/03/14/progress-on-nfa-firearms/#comment-21389 Hello Sun, 13 Apr 2008 17:54:39 +0000 http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/2008/03/14/progress-on-nfa-firearms/#comment-21389 >>admitting that machine guns were not “assault weapons.” I'll remember that. >>admitting that machine guns were not “assault weapons.”

I’ll remember that.

]]> By: BCross http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/2008/03/14/progress-on-nfa-firearms/#comment-20255 BCross Fri, 14 Mar 2008 21:08:05 +0000 http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/2008/03/14/progress-on-nfa-firearms/#comment-20255 Reminds me of one of the things I thought was funny about the Brady evaluation of Kansas for their rankings. They stated that Kansas has no restrictions on assault weapons. I found this funny because, as a Kansas resident, I cannot (yet) legally possess a fully automatic weapon, a suppressor, or a shotgun with a short barrel. (Short-barreled rifles are apparently OK though.) I took it to mean that they were admitting that machine guns were not "assault weapons." Reminds me of one of the things I thought was funny about the Brady evaluation of Kansas for their rankings. They stated that Kansas has no restrictions on assault weapons. I found this funny because, as a Kansas resident, I cannot (yet) legally possess a fully automatic weapon, a suppressor, or a shotgun with a short barrel. (Short-barreled rifles are apparently OK though.) I took it to mean that they were admitting that machine guns were not “assault weapons.”

]]>