Comments on: Assault Weapons Ban in Nebraska http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/2008/02/21/assault-weapons-ban-in-nebraska/ Where There's Snow, There's Firepower Thu, 20 Nov 2008 09:19:38 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3 By: Sebastian http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/2008/02/21/assault-weapons-ban-in-nebraska/#comment-19373 Sebastian Thu, 21 Feb 2008 20:04:22 +0000 http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=2723#comment-19373 The term "Assault Weapon" is a one of law. The politicians are the ones using it, not us. The term “Assault Weapon” is a one of law. The politicians are the ones using it, not us.

]]> By: Carl in Chicago http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/2008/02/21/assault-weapons-ban-in-nebraska/#comment-19371 Carl in Chicago Thu, 21 Feb 2008 19:58:05 +0000 http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=2723#comment-19371 Let's get our ducks in a row, shall we? Josh Sugarmann must be loving how we use his misnomer. There is NO risk in how an "assault weapon" is defined. The risk is in what characteristics of semi-automatic weapons are deemed dangerous enough to justify prohibition thereof. Just because "assault weapon" has become a household term describing certain semiauto firearms doesn't mean that those of us who know better have to go on perpetuating the misnomer. Let’s get our ducks in a row, shall we? Josh Sugarmann must be loving how we use his misnomer.

There is NO risk in how an “assault weapon” is defined. The risk is in what characteristics of semi-automatic weapons are deemed dangerous enough to justify prohibition thereof.

Just because “assault weapon” has become a household term describing certain semiauto firearms doesn’t mean that those of us who know better have to go on perpetuating the misnomer.

]]> By: DirtCrashr http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/2008/02/21/assault-weapons-ban-in-nebraska/#comment-19367 DirtCrashr Thu, 21 Feb 2008 18:38:47 +0000 http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=2723#comment-19367 Sounds about like what we have in CA, now it depends on how they write up the list of outlawed receivers... Sounds about like what we have in CA, now it depends on how they write up the list of outlawed receivers…

]]>