<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Role of Judicial Reivew</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/2008/01/28/the-role-of-judicial-reivew/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/2008/01/28/the-role-of-judicial-reivew/</link>
	<description>Where There's Snow, There's Firepower</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 12:25:48 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: straightarrow</title>
		<link>http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/2008/01/28/the-role-of-judicial-reivew/#comment-18411</link>
		<dc:creator>straightarrow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 04:18:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=2536#comment-18411</guid>
		<description>"A “consent of the governed” legitimacy model surmises that the democratic process offers any meaningful consent.  I did not consent to have John McCain and Russ Feingold limit my rights to speak out against them in any meaningful way, yet all three branches of the federal government have upheld this, despite the fact that I believe the majority of people would recognize it was a violation of freedom of speech if it were explained to them in detail."-Sebastian

It is implied consent, much like the legal fiction of implied consent regarding sobriety tests for drivers.  If you voted for people who voted for this crap your consent may be inferred by them as implied by us.

A legal fiction is a term of art that is used to mask a lie.

xrlq probably doesn't know what a term of art is, but he will be sure to uphold the legal fiction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;A “consent of the governed” legitimacy model surmises that the democratic process offers any meaningful consent.  I did not consent to have John McCain and Russ Feingold limit my rights to speak out against them in any meaningful way, yet all three branches of the federal government have upheld this, despite the fact that I believe the majority of people would recognize it was a violation of freedom of speech if it were explained to them in detail.&#8221;-Sebastian</p>
<p>It is implied consent, much like the legal fiction of implied consent regarding sobriety tests for drivers.  If you voted for people who voted for this crap your consent may be inferred by them as implied by us.</p>
<p>A legal fiction is a term of art that is used to mask a lie.</p>
<p>xrlq probably doesn&#8217;t know what a term of art is, but he will be sure to uphold the legal fiction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alcibiades McZombie</title>
		<link>http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/2008/01/28/the-role-of-judicial-reivew/#comment-18395</link>
		<dc:creator>Alcibiades McZombie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 22:37:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=2536#comment-18395</guid>
		<description>I'm kind of against self-determination for a similar reason.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m kind of against self-determination for a similar reason.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
