<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Things Learned Reloading</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/2008/01/24/things-learned-reloading/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/2008/01/24/things-learned-reloading/</link>
	<description>Where There's Snow, There's Firepower</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 13:09:01 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Reloading, Log Book Suggestions</title>
		<link>http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/2008/01/24/things-learned-reloading/#comment-19763</link>
		<dc:creator>Reloading, Log Book Suggestions</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 05:35:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=2505#comment-19763</guid>
		<description>[...] to find a load that works well for your gun. I am still relatively new at this myself, but I've noted a few lessons learned.    __________________ Snowflakes in Hell Blog Boomsticks, Politics, and Current Events in  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to find a load that works well for your gun. I am still relatively new at this myself, but I&#8217;ve noted a few lessons learned.    __________________ Snowflakes in Hell Blog Boomsticks, Politics, and Current Events in  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Firehand</title>
		<link>http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/2008/01/24/things-learned-reloading/#comment-18379</link>
		<dc:creator>Firehand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 16:28:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=2505#comment-18379</guid>
		<description>I think almost every powder scale, beam and electronic, says 'accurate to +/- 0.1 grain'.  Unless you go to some kind of laboratory scale, that's about as good as it gets.  And unless you're loading WAY up at the hot end, not an amount to worry about.

I have two problems with every powder measure I've tried: they don't like to throw the stick powders like IMR4064(tend to cut grains), and they're sticky with flake powders.  Ball powders like 2400 flow through like water, easy to stay consistent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think almost every powder scale, beam and electronic, says &#8216;accurate to +/- 0.1 grain&#8217;.  Unless you go to some kind of laboratory scale, that&#8217;s about as good as it gets.  And unless you&#8217;re loading WAY up at the hot end, not an amount to worry about.</p>
<p>I have two problems with every powder measure I&#8217;ve tried: they don&#8217;t like to throw the stick powders like IMR4064(tend to cut grains), and they&#8217;re sticky with flake powders.  Ball powders like 2400 flow through like water, easy to stay consistent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Byrne</title>
		<link>http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/2008/01/24/things-learned-reloading/#comment-18292</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Byrne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2008 05:41:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=2505#comment-18292</guid>
		<description>See theres your problem right there ;-)

Honestly, the Lees are not very repeatable.

I have both the RCBS and Hornady manual measure; and both will throw to +/-.1gr with most powders once properly adjusted; and presuming consistent technique.

I also have the RCBS electric measure and scale, and oh my god it's the best thing in the world for precision reloading. It easily tripled my loading speed on precision rifle rounds. 

I have a whole bunch of stuff about this in my reloading section

http://anarchangel.blogspot.com/search/label/reloading</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>See theres your problem right there ;-)</p>
<p>Honestly, the Lees are not very repeatable.</p>
<p>I have both the RCBS and Hornady manual measure; and both will throw to +/-.1gr with most powders once properly adjusted; and presuming consistent technique.</p>
<p>I also have the RCBS electric measure and scale, and oh my god it&#8217;s the best thing in the world for precision reloading. It easily tripled my loading speed on precision rifle rounds. </p>
<p>I have a whole bunch of stuff about this in my reloading section</p>
<p><a href="http://anarchangel.blogspot.com/search/label/reloading" rel="nofollow">http://anarchangel.blogspot.com/search/label/reloading</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sebastian</title>
		<link>http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/2008/01/24/things-learned-reloading/#comment-18263</link>
		<dc:creator>Sebastian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 19:01:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=2505#comment-18263</guid>
		<description>I'm using a lee powder dispenser.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m using a lee powder dispenser.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laughingdog</title>
		<link>http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/2008/01/24/things-learned-reloading/#comment-18256</link>
		<dc:creator>Laughingdog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 18:42:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=2505#comment-18256</guid>
		<description>What brand of reloader are you using?  I have a Dillon Precision RL550, and I get the exact same amount of powder out every time, unless of course I'm not using the proper powder bar for the job.

I think the number one thing I've learned from reloading is that 9mm is one of the best rounds to learn with.  Unlike older cartridge sizes, the gunpowder for a slightly hot round already completely fills the cartridge, making it very obvious when you screw up and try to double load.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What brand of reloader are you using?  I have a Dillon Precision RL550, and I get the exact same amount of powder out every time, unless of course I&#8217;m not using the proper powder bar for the job.</p>
<p>I think the number one thing I&#8217;ve learned from reloading is that 9mm is one of the best rounds to learn with.  Unlike older cartridge sizes, the gunpowder for a slightly hot round already completely fills the cartridge, making it very obvious when you screw up and try to double load.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MadRocketScientist</title>
		<link>http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/2008/01/24/things-learned-reloading/#comment-18208</link>
		<dc:creator>MadRocketScientist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 00:32:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=2505#comment-18208</guid>
		<description>So shooting degrades the brass faster than polishing ever would.

Good to know, thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So shooting degrades the brass faster than polishing ever would.</p>
<p>Good to know, thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Huffman</title>
		<link>http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/2008/01/24/things-learned-reloading/#comment-18205</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Huffman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 23:27:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=2505#comment-18205</guid>
		<description>With the powders I used in my precision rifles +/- 0.1 grains is about +/- 3 kernels of propellant and less than 0.15% difference in powder mass. Assuming the expression that describes MV is a linear function with a zero offset (not true, this is a worst case assumption) then this variation in powder mass would make a difference of less than +/- 5 fps with my rifles.

I have a power trickler and really like it.

As far as the lead goes, shooting at indoor ranges with bullets that have lead exposed on the base are probably the biggest source of exposure. When handling bullets I always wear vinyl or nitrile  (I have a mild allergy to latex) gloves. This protects me from the lead as well as the ammo from salts and oils from my fingers.

Many primers have lead in them so handling the spent primers is a mild hazard and you should wear gloves when handling them. Same with the polishing media from your brass tumbler.

I have an air cleaner running on my reloading bench to catch the dust from the tumbler media and the spent primers. Be sure to treat the air filter as toxic waste when you change it. Wear gloves and a face mask to filter your air.

As part of my yearly physical I get my blood tested for lead. Even when I was reloading 1000 rounds a month and shooting indoors two and three times a week my lead never got out of the normal range. It is now down to the undetectable range even though I still reload some.

My first chronograph was a second hand cheapy thing that I had problems with in low light. I bought another one a little over a year ago and bought the version that has IR lights such that I can use under any conditions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With the powders I used in my precision rifles +/- 0.1 grains is about +/- 3 kernels of propellant and less than 0.15% difference in powder mass. Assuming the expression that describes MV is a linear function with a zero offset (not true, this is a worst case assumption) then this variation in powder mass would make a difference of less than +/- 5 fps with my rifles.</p>
<p>I have a power trickler and really like it.</p>
<p>As far as the lead goes, shooting at indoor ranges with bullets that have lead exposed on the base are probably the biggest source of exposure. When handling bullets I always wear vinyl or nitrile  (I have a mild allergy to latex) gloves. This protects me from the lead as well as the ammo from salts and oils from my fingers.</p>
<p>Many primers have lead in them so handling the spent primers is a mild hazard and you should wear gloves when handling them. Same with the polishing media from your brass tumbler.</p>
<p>I have an air cleaner running on my reloading bench to catch the dust from the tumbler media and the spent primers. Be sure to treat the air filter as toxic waste when you change it. Wear gloves and a face mask to filter your air.</p>
<p>As part of my yearly physical I get my blood tested for lead. Even when I was reloading 1000 rounds a month and shooting indoors two and three times a week my lead never got out of the normal range. It is now down to the undetectable range even though I still reload some.</p>
<p>My first chronograph was a second hand cheapy thing that I had problems with in low light. I bought another one a little over a year ago and bought the version that has IR lights such that I can use under any conditions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheGunGeek</title>
		<link>http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/2008/01/24/things-learned-reloading/#comment-18200</link>
		<dc:creator>TheGunGeek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 21:13:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=2505#comment-18200</guid>
		<description>I'm thinking Power Trickle is a typo of Powder Trickle which is itself a typo of Powder Trickler.

For lead exposure, it's a good thing to get some EDTA supplements into your system. This stuff is clinically proven to get the lead out.

FWIW, I also take N-Acetyl Cysteine which is an anti-osidant that has been shown to significantly reduce hearing loss due to loud noises, and  while it works best if taken ahead of time even works if taken up to several hours after the noise exposure. Somewhere around here I've got some articles on the subject in real medical journals.  In fact, the military has been doing testing with it. Granted, we should all be using quality hearing protection, but I like to play it safe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m thinking Power Trickle is a typo of Powder Trickle which is itself a typo of Powder Trickler.</p>
<p>For lead exposure, it&#8217;s a good thing to get some EDTA supplements into your system. This stuff is clinically proven to get the lead out.</p>
<p>FWIW, I also take N-Acetyl Cysteine which is an anti-osidant that has been shown to significantly reduce hearing loss due to loud noises, and  while it works best if taken ahead of time even works if taken up to several hours after the noise exposure. Somewhere around here I&#8217;ve got some articles on the subject in real medical journals.  In fact, the military has been doing testing with it. Granted, we should all be using quality hearing protection, but I like to play it safe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sebastian</title>
		<link>http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/2008/01/24/things-learned-reloading/#comment-18199</link>
		<dc:creator>Sebastian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 20:48:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=2505#comment-18199</guid>
		<description>It's not really the polishing that degrades the casing, it's the stress of being fired repeatedly.   That's dependent on the type of cartridge, and type of gun you're firing it out of.  With a semi-automatic firearm, you might get 5 or so uses out of the brass before it's too weak to reuse.  Bolt action guns tend to have tighter chambers, so you can get more use out of a piece of brass.  Before you reload, you check for signs of stress, like a bright ring around the base that would indicate potential case head separation if you were to reuse that piece of brass.  Also look for things like cracks along the neck of the cartridge, or cracks in the brass itself.  You'll also have to trim the brass down, as the cases tend to lengthen with firing.  The lengthening is basically brass moving from stress areas to less stress areas, like the neck.  If you do this more than a few times, it means the brass is getting thin in critical places. 

My plan, since I fire my reloads out of semi-automatic rifles, is to reuse the case no more than 4 times.   Brass isn't that awfully expensive, and I figure the case has paid for itself by then.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not really the polishing that degrades the casing, it&#8217;s the stress of being fired repeatedly.   That&#8217;s dependent on the type of cartridge, and type of gun you&#8217;re firing it out of.  With a semi-automatic firearm, you might get 5 or so uses out of the brass before it&#8217;s too weak to reuse.  Bolt action guns tend to have tighter chambers, so you can get more use out of a piece of brass.  Before you reload, you check for signs of stress, like a bright ring around the base that would indicate potential case head separation if you were to reuse that piece of brass.  Also look for things like cracks along the neck of the cartridge, or cracks in the brass itself.  You&#8217;ll also have to trim the brass down, as the cases tend to lengthen with firing.  The lengthening is basically brass moving from stress areas to less stress areas, like the neck.  If you do this more than a few times, it means the brass is getting thin in critical places. </p>
<p>My plan, since I fire my reloads out of semi-automatic rifles, is to reuse the case no more than 4 times.   Brass isn&#8217;t that awfully expensive, and I figure the case has paid for itself by then.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Madrocketscientist</title>
		<link>http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/2008/01/24/things-learned-reloading/#comment-18198</link>
		<dc:creator>Madrocketscientist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 20:38:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=2505#comment-18198</guid>
		<description>Question, how many times can you polish casings before the casing gets too thin to contain the pressures?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Question, how many times can you polish casings before the casing gets too thin to contain the pressures?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robb Allen</title>
		<link>http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/2008/01/24/things-learned-reloading/#comment-18196</link>
		<dc:creator>Robb Allen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 19:37:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=2505#comment-18196</guid>
		<description>Power Trickles lasting more than 4 hours should be seen by a doctor, I think.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Power Trickles lasting more than 4 hours should be seen by a doctor, I think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sebastian</title>
		<link>http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/2008/01/24/things-learned-reloading/#comment-18195</link>
		<dc:creator>Sebastian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 19:36:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=2505#comment-18195</guid>
		<description>A power trickle is a typo of powder trickle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A power trickle is a typo of powder trickle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alcibiades McZombie</title>
		<link>http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/2008/01/24/things-learned-reloading/#comment-18194</link>
		<dc:creator>Alcibiades McZombie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 19:33:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=2505#comment-18194</guid>
		<description>What's a "power trickle"?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s a &#8220;power trickle&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rightwingprof</title>
		<link>http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/2008/01/24/things-learned-reloading/#comment-18191</link>
		<dc:creator>rightwingprof</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 19:15:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=2505#comment-18191</guid>
		<description>I never got into reloading. It looks tedious, and I'm not good (to say the least) with tedious.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I never got into reloading. It looks tedious, and I&#8217;m not good (to say the least) with tedious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robb Allen</title>
		<link>http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/2008/01/24/things-learned-reloading/#comment-18187</link>
		<dc:creator>Robb Allen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 18:36:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=2505#comment-18187</guid>
		<description>I lucked out. The scale I bought was D-I-R-T cheap - like $7 with $10 for shipping.

It came with some weights and measures them perfectly each and every time. Put a 110 grain bullet on there and you're getting 110 grains in weight.

I think it can be off by .1± grain though so it's not something you want to use if you're aiming for ultra precision, but I double check quite often against my beam scale and haven't seen any discrepancies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I lucked out. The scale I bought was D-I-R-T cheap - like $7 with $10 for shipping.</p>
<p>It came with some weights and measures them perfectly each and every time. Put a 110 grain bullet on there and you&#8217;re getting 110 grains in weight.</p>
<p>I think it can be off by .1± grain though so it&#8217;s not something you want to use if you&#8217;re aiming for ultra precision, but I double check quite often against my beam scale and haven&#8217;t seen any discrepancies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
