Comments on: You Don’t Need An AK-47 to Hunt Deer http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/2007/11/21/you-dont-need-an-ak-47-to-hunt-deer/ Where There's Snow, There's Firepower Wed, 03 Dec 2008 01:24:25 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3 By: random http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/2007/11/21/you-dont-need-an-ak-47-to-hunt-deer/#comment-14992 random Thu, 22 Nov 2007 04:16:17 +0000 http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=1970#comment-14992 That kind of reminds me of when the "assault weapons" ban ended. I remember someone on the news said and I quote "Now you can mow down bambi with an uzi." Which would almost be funny if you didn't remember that people belive it. That kind of reminds me of when the “assault weapons” ban ended. I remember someone on the news said and I quote “Now you can mow down bambi with an uzi.” Which would almost be funny if you didn’t remember that people belive it.

]]> By: Alcibiades McZombie http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/2007/11/21/you-dont-need-an-ak-47-to-hunt-deer/#comment-14982 Alcibiades McZombie Wed, 21 Nov 2007 20:04:06 +0000 http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=1970#comment-14982 Whoops, I meant "deer". Whoops, I meant “deer”.

]]> By: Alcibiades McZombie http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/2007/11/21/you-dont-need-an-ak-47-to-hunt-deer/#comment-14981 Alcibiades McZombie Wed, 21 Nov 2007 20:03:50 +0000 http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=1970#comment-14981 In theory, there could be no bag limit and you could take 30 dear... In theory, there could be no bag limit and you could take 30 dear…

]]> By: chris http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/2007/11/21/you-dont-need-an-ak-47-to-hunt-deer/#comment-14974 chris Wed, 21 Nov 2007 18:26:29 +0000 http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=1970#comment-14974 if you need 30 rounds to hit a deer, you can never take a piss in my toilet if you need 30 rounds to hit a deer, you can never take a piss in my toilet

]]> By: kaveman http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/2007/11/21/you-dont-need-an-ak-47-to-hunt-deer/#comment-14971 kaveman Wed, 21 Nov 2007 17:13:43 +0000 http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=1970#comment-14971 And we all know the the Founding Fathers drafted the 2A to protect the rights of hunters. Am I the only one who sees the irony of the following statements? "An AK-47 is good at one thing only, that's killing people." "An AK-47 is not suitable for hunting." So....an AK-47 is perfect for killing a 200lb human but ineffective against a 90lb white-tail deer. Hmmmmm And we all know the the Founding Fathers drafted the 2A to protect the rights of hunters.

Am I the only one who sees the irony of the following statements?

“An AK-47 is good at one thing only, that’s killing people.”

“An AK-47 is not suitable for hunting.”

So….an AK-47 is perfect for killing a 200lb human but ineffective against a 90lb white-tail deer.

Hmmmmm

]]> By: Rustmeister http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/2007/11/21/you-dont-need-an-ak-47-to-hunt-deer/#comment-14968 Rustmeister Wed, 21 Nov 2007 16:36:22 +0000 http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/?p=1970#comment-14968 Yeah, people have been using the 30-30 round since forever. Not a huge difference between the two. And why do people keep saying "you don't need 30 rounds to hunt"? Most states outlaw more than either three or five anyway. Guess that's the old "selective amnesia" kicking in again. Yeah, people have been using the 30-30 round since forever. Not a huge difference between the two.

And why do people keep saying “you don’t need 30 rounds to hunt”? Most states outlaw more than either three or five anyway. Guess that’s the old “selective amnesia” kicking in again.

]]>