Snowflakes in Hell

This is a very amusing story out of the UK:

The pupil’s mum had ordered an agency to give her son a “surprise” on his 16th birthday - and the teacher had even agreed to film the prank.

But it all went wrong when the unnamed company sent a stripper dressed as a policewoman instead of a “gorillagram” - in what it called a booking error.

I’m guessing the kid probably isn’t too distraught about the mix up.

Scott Bach is talking about the results from New Jersey’s election this Tuesday.

And that’s exactly what happened in the 12th district on November 6. Fed up with overzealous legislative attacks, sportsmen and sportswomen turned out in force to register their disapproval with the flip of a voting lever. And register their disapproval they did…

Read the whole thing.  This is a very positive development.  I might just have to take New Jersey out of the “lost cause” category.

Uncle links to the top 10 crime guns.  I’m glad to see criminals are still buying American!  There’s not a foreign gun on the list.  Damn patriotic fellows they are eh?

Seriously though, another interesting tidbit was commented on by  PN NJ, which is the caliber officers were shot with.  Rifles by nature will be overrepresented out of proportion to their prevalence in crime because police body armor will typically stop most pistol rounds, but won’t stop rounds fired from a rifle.

In 2006, 46 police officers were killed in the line of duty.  Thirty six of them were murdered with pistols.  It’s interesting that the .40 S&W is the largest category.  Are criminals carrying this more or do .40 S&W rounds have more likelihood to penetrate soft body armor?

The number of officers killed with a rifle were eight.  Of those, four were with what would normally be classified as an “assault weapon” caliber.  That’s about 8.6% of officer killings.  We’ve all heard the VPC/Brady statistics that claimed 20% officers were killed with an assault weapon.  Even if you look at 1997 through 2006, the number still only rises to 13%, with rifles in total being the 20% figure.  Overall, handguns were 73% of all casualty figures.  Prior to the expiration of the assault weapons ban expiration, 14% of officers were shot with calibers that would normally be classified as assault weapon calibers.  Since the ban has expired in 2004, that number has dropped to 11%.

So it would appear from that data that the best way to protect our nation’s police officers is ensure police departments have sufficient funding for body armor, proper armament and training.  If the VPC or Brady Campaign want to claim the assault weapons ban mattered, the statistics sure don’t seem to be bear it out.

Congratulate yourselves. We’ve advanced beyond the 6th grade reading level most publications go for:

Via Breda

… before he was against them.  Someone on Mitt’s staff must have dropped the ball.  People might start thinking Mitt once supported gay rights.

Mr. Romney’s standing among conservatives is being hurt by a letter he sent to the Log Cabin Club of Massachusetts saying that he would be a stronger advocate for gay rights than Senator Edward M. Kennedy, his opponent in a Senate race, in a position that stands in contrast to his current role as a champion of a state constitutional amendment banning same-sex marriage.

“We must make equality for gays and lesbians a mainstream concern,” Mr. Romney wrote in a detailed plea for the support of the club, a gay Republican organization.

It’s not much of a secret I think Mitt is the least desirable Republican candidate, which is part of why I think he has a chance of winning the nomination.  I trust him less than I trust Rudy, and I don’t really trust Rudy.

Jeff links to this article in the November ABA Journal via this piece and asks whether NRA tried to deliberately scuttle Parker. There’s little doubt in my mind that there was an attempt to undermine Parker. There is disagreement as to the wisdom of pursuing relief through the courts. It’s legitimate disagreement. The NRA-bashers offer it up as evidence of trying to scuttle the case to keep gun control alive for fund raising purposes (A silly argument. A loss at the Supreme Court would be far better for fund raising and membership numbers than keeping the DC gun ban), when the real purpose is because losing is a real risk. I’m sure there’s also some ego issues at play, but I think that’s the case on both sides of the coin.

NRA was wrong to try to undermine Parker. The attorneys in the case make a good point that second amendment’s time of reckoning is here, and we probably won’t see a better case under more favorable conditions on the court. Nonetheless, it’s a real risk we’ll lose in the end. If Heller prevails, Levy, Gura and the rest of his team will be everyone’s hero. If not, we’re all going to have to eat crow and tell the Parker detractors they were right.