Snowflakes in Hell

There was a time when I thought that it might actually be nice if Pennsylvania passed a training requirement so that we could get expanded reciprocity with other states.  I heard from people that our lack of training requirement was a real impediment to signing with states that had “substitutively similar” language in their reciprocity statues.

I don’t think that anymore.   Pennsylvania has done pretty well in signing reciprocity agreements in the past few years with other states.  While we’re still lacking some key ones I’d like to see, like Colorado, West Virginia, and Delaware, it’s a much better state of affairs then it used to be.

Today we have reciprocity agreements with:

1. New Hampshire
2. Virginia
3. North Carolina
4. Georgia
5. Florida
6. Michigan
7. Kentucky
8. Tennessee
9. Missouri
10. Oklahoma
11. Texas
12. Wyoming
13. South Dakota
14. Alaska

In addition, our LTC is recognized by:

1. Montana
2. Idaho
3. Utah
4. Indiana

This is quite an improvement over several years ago, and I hope it will keep improving.   Tom Corbett’s office deserves kudos for working hard on getting so many new agreements.  Hopefully in a few years we’ll be pretty close to universal reciprocity among states, despite boneheaded actions like we saw from the politicians in Colorado earlier in the week.

Publicola is quitting blogging.  It’s good to know that I wasn’t the only person who was crazy enough to start a blog to impress a chick.  I have no plans of quitting blogging, but I understand how people could get burnt out.  It can be time consuming, draining, and sometimes you just feel completely uninspired.

Instapundit is skeptical of another hydrogen powered technology with the potential to not help much with our energy problems.

This one looks pretty identical to the magnesium based process that was talked about last month, and it suffers from the same problem. Aluminum is expensive, and it takes a LOT of energy to produce aluminum from bauxite ore, particularly electrical energy, which in this country, is produced mainly by burning coal.

The main problem with hydrogen is that it’s not an energy source. It’s a way of storing energy. To make hydrogen, you still need a source of energy that’s coming from some other source. In addition, it would be difficult to pack enough hydrogen into a small enough space to be a practical motor fuel, and it would be completely impractical to power larger vehicles like airplanes.

I can see this company is also big on the hype as well:

For Woodall, the biggest speed bump lies elsewhere. “The egos of program managers at DOE are holding up the revolution,” he told msnbc.com.

No, I’m pretty sure the laws of physics and principles of economics are what’s holding up the hydrogen revolution.

My example of Colorado earlier really has me steamed, not so much because it presents an intractable barrier to reciprocity with Colorado.  Indeed, I plan to talk to Tom Corbett, our state Attorney General, about approaching Colorado with a reciprocity agreement with Pennsylvania.  What has me steamed is it’s an example, which happens in areas other than guns, but happens especially with guns, of legislating to solve a non-problem in a way that wouldn’t help even if the problem existed.

What can be the public safety rationale in banning non-resident licenses?  If the goal was to keep Colorado residents from seeking out of state licenses in lieu of having to obtain a license from Colorado, that could have been easily accomplished without cutting into the reciprocity law as much as lawmakers have chosen to do here.

The application process for a Florida license, is identical whether or not you’re a resident of that state.  You must go through training, you must submit fingerprints, and you must have a clean criminal record.  When carrying in Colorado, persons in possession of a license, whether in state or out of state, are bound to follow Colorado law.  So what problem is this an attempt to solve?  I can see the rationale in preventing Colorado residents from using foreign permits, even if I think the legislature is trying to solve a non-problem here.  But why cut that deep into reciprocity?

I don’t think they could come up with a good explanation for this.  I doubt they could provide any serious evidence that there is an actual problem.  What happened is, Democrats were elected, and wanted to pass something against concealed carry.   Knowing full well a repeal of right-to-carry would probably piss off too many people, they went with this option.  People outside of Colorado can’t vote after all, and they can all feel good that they “strengthened Colorado’s weak guns laws”.   The symbolism of guns has always been more important than the actual hunk of metal itself, especially to the political left.

When laws like this are passed without any compelling reason or rationale, other than to strike a blow against a frowned upon liberty, it’s polarizing.  It justifies saying no to everything, no matter how innocuous or trivial, and no matter how great the public interest.

Kevin has a fisking of Al Gore’s complaint that rational debate has fallen by the wayside. While I can sympathize with Gore over the banality of the media, what he doesn’t seem to get is that we have a wonderful conversation going on here in the blogosphere. He sees his invention of the Internet has a potential remedy for this malaise, but fails to realize the party has already started without him. So where’s your blog Al Gore? We’re here, and ready to talk.

If all you want are reasonable gun laws, then why are you trying to hard to preserve Washington D.C.’s total gun prohibition, and doing everything to discredit the notion that Americans have a constitutional right to keep and bear arms?

You guys are so lucky to have a sympathetic media who is happy not to ask these questions.

The Democrats in Colorado just limited reciprocity to resident permits only.   That means my Florida permit is now worthless in Colorado.   Pennsylvania does not have reciprocity with Colorado.  You can see the text of the bill here.

Clarifies that a person cannot use a permit to carry a concealed
handgun that is issued by another state if the person does not reside in the
issuing state.

I had plans to do a big hiking trip in Colorado.   I will now take my business to a state that will allow me to defend myself while on the trail.  Especially considering it’s Colorado that’s had problems with cougar attacks.

The general assembly hereby finds determines, and declares that this act is necessary for the immediate23 preservation of the public peace, health, and safety.24

Any bets on whether the Colorado General Assembly can find even a single case of an out of state permit holder causing a problem?  I’ll bet they can’t.  Folks in Colorado, you have some politicians that need to be thrown out on their asses next election.

Hat Tip: Jeff Soyer