You learn something new….
Posted by:Sebastian on
Apr 19th, 2007 |
Filed under: Guns
Feinstein may be clueless about the content of her ban. However, the picture book story isn’t about her. It’s about the drafting of the California state AW ban, after the Stockton murders.
The drafters did indeed look at a picture book (Gun Digest, I think) and just pick out guns based on appearance.
That’s why California (and copycat jurisdictions like Denver) banned the “Encom CM-55,” which doesn’t exist. The CM-55 was made by another company, but the words “Encom” and “CM-55″ appeared on the same page, and so the stupid drafters thought they referred to a single gun.
It’s also how they banned the non-existent “H-93″ rifle — because Gun Digest had a typo “H” instead of “HK” which the California legislature blindly copied.
I had heard that, but always figured it was just a story. They actually did go through the magazine and pick out scary looking guns? Unbelievable.
Related posts (automatically generated):

Second Amendment Blog
April 19th, 2007 at 12:34 pm
Linky no workee.
April 19th, 2007 at 1:10 pm
Same with the defunct fed ban.
April 19th, 2007 at 1:25 pm
Fixed
April 19th, 2007 at 1:56 pm
Sounds par for the course… Afterall, McCarthy wants to ban barrel shrouds yet she has no idea what they are.
“Just trust me. I’m from the governemnt and I’m here to help you.”